Tibor R. Machan
Most executives draw pretty reasonable salaries, maybe up from $250K to
several millions per year and bonuses, depending on how the company is
doing or how important the executive’s contributions is expected to be.
This isn’t unlike how baseball and football players are hired and
compensated, especially the stars among them.
Some people are sought out very eagerly and promised exorbitant pay,
including bonuses above the regular salary, and all this is agreed to from
the outset, after pretty heavy negotiation. Contracts usually specify the
terms, some of them unconditional, some conditional. If bonuses are
promised no matter how the company is doing, this will be binding just as
such contracts are binding in professional sports so that if a very
promising hire turns out not to have done well, payment must still be made.
With the current brouhaha about high payouts in bonuses to company
executives whose companies didn’t manage to be successful, it may appear
to be unjust to pay as per the terms of the contract but it isn’t. As the
saying goes, a promise is a promise.
Where trouble arises is when a company is receiving public funds in order
to remain in operation and a sizable portion of these funds is used to pay
bonuses agreed to prior to the bailout. What has happened is that the
company’s authority to pay the bonuses has diminished since the original
contract was drawn up independently of the public intervention and
subsidy. That, of course, could also have been taken care of by the terms
of the contract–it could have specified that regardless of whether the
company receives bailout funds, the compensation to the executive will
remain the same. Or the terms of the bailout could have included a
provisions that the original terms granting huge bonuses to executives
needs to be changed for the bailout to go into effect.
I think looking at the matter along these lines should clear up any
confusion about the current furor of executive compensation. But, sadly,
the executive compensation issue seems to be a fodder for once again
tearing down capitalism. And this time out of rank envy. Why all the fuss
about the high pay executives get so long as they aren’t stealing it?
Makes you sick to see all these people fret about how well their fellows
are doing. Oddly, in sports this attitude doesn’t appear to be dominant,
so when Tiger Woods is doing well people aren’t demanding that he be
brought down and make room for inferior golfers. Or with Kobe Bryant or
But when CEOs make big bucks from their closed offices, never mind what
goes into their work, how much aggravation and preparation and anxiety,
they immediately get attacked. This is precisely what makes some of us
concerned about Obama & Co., this attitude of always looking at how others
are doing, how well off they may be and how this cannot be tolerated. It
is in fact the typical socialist mentality, one that was evident all over
the Soviet bloc when I lived there–the snooping, the worry about how well
others are doing. And that made some sense since socialism is a
collectivist system and the tragedy of the commons and a zero sum game
mentality prevail there, with no clear way to tell who earned what, who
should enjoy how much. But in a near capitalist society agreements take
care of this–if the CEO gets what was agreed to, that’s the end of it.
Unless, of course, the system has come to be corrupted by bailouts and
subsidies and partial nationalizations.
I recall when I came West from communist Hungary I enjoyed all the wealth
that surrounded me despite having hardly any of it myself. What a great
thing that people can make lots of money and obtain what they needed and
wanted for themselves and their loved ones. Look at all those great homes,
fabulous cars, exquisite eateries, you name it and I found it all
thrilling because it showed what all is possible for those who work hard
and have a bit of luck.
But not long thereafter I realized, to my dismay, that even in the West,
even in America, too many people are green with envy and would rather work
on bringing down their fellows than getting up there themselves. Shame on