Column on Rand and Selfishness

Ayn Rand & Selfishness
Tibor R. Machan
For more than forty years I have been seriously interested in the ideas of
Ayn Rand, ever since I read her novels and later her non-fiction works.
This despite the fact that Miss Rand once declared me “persona non grata”
for writing her a disagreeable letter. Oh well, but her ideas never ceased
to intrigue me and after much study and reflection I still think her
philosophy of Objectivism is largely right.
One element of Rand’s idea is the notion that selfishness is good, which
clearly runs counter to received opinion both Left and Right. And she has
received a great deal of rebuke for finding self-interest a proper pursuit
for all human beings. I think, however, that this is due to a colossal
misunderstanding of Rand’s position.
One of Rand’s non-fiction books is titled, quite deliberately, The Virtue
of Selfishness, A New Concept of Egoism (New American Library, 1964). The
title is still widely misunderstood, despite Rand’s attempt to warn
readers, by way of the subtitle, that she is advocating something unusual.
The terms “selfishness” and “self-interest” are not simple ones because
the meaning of the term “self” is very much in dispute. In fact it is one
of the most controversial ideas in human history. Another and similarly
controversial idea is “individual.” These are what some philosophers have
called essentially contestable concepts. That means they are by their very
nature always being argued about, like “liberty,” “justice,” “democracy,”
or “morality.”
In ancient Greece the self was understood as the human soul and while it
meant the soul of the individual, it was also taken as a social
concept–the human self was supposed to be something intimately tied to
the social group within which one lived. A good self, for example, was
understood as one that’s gregarious, liberal, generous, and engaging. In
the ethical writings of Aristotle, for example, the system of principles
one should live by was called eudemonia, the set of guidelines for
achieving a good self or soul, or, in other words, happiness. And that
implied living rationally, governed by the rules of reason, the virtues,
some of which had to do with self-perfection, some with considerateness.
This was all changed in the 17th century, mostly at the hands of the
English philosopher Thomas Hobbes. For him the human self consisted of raw
impulses or beastly drives to gain power in life. Thus the term “selfish”
changed its meaning, too. Instead of implying eudemonia–a decent,
benevolent self–it came to imply something closer to hedonism, pleasure
seeking and power hunger at all cost. The self lost its connection to
reason. Instead it became connected to mindless feeling or passion. So a
selfish act would come to be one that is driven by someone’s feelings,
passions, or emotions, not someone’s good judgment.
Ayn Rand tried to do the nearly impossible thing of returning the concept
of the human self to what it used to mean for the ancient Greeks with but
a few amendments added based on modern psychology. But the bulk of the
world had by then accepted the Hobbesian idea and used “selfish” to mean
“self-indulgent,” ruled by one’s feelings or emotions.
So, sadly, despite her efforts to make herself clear–not just by the
subtitle of her book but, especially, by its content–Rand left the
impression that she was advocating a Hobbesian idea of the human self or
ego–a kind of wild, unruly, irrational element that drove one to do
anything one damn well felt like doing.
Rand’s one time intellectual partner, Nathaniel Branden, tried to undue
the damage by writing his book, Honoring the Self: Personal Integrity and
the Heroic Potentials of Human Nature (Los Angeles : J.P. Tarcher, 1983).
Unfortunately, the work didn’t manage to alter the way most people,
especially the anti-individualist intellectuals in the culture, used the
term “self.”
Still, it is perhaps useful now and then to try to set the record
straight. Ayn Rand, a very popular novelist and thinker, was not
advocating rapacious, nasty, brutal, inconsiderate “selfishness” as her
detractors maintain. That’s because she had a noble view of the human
self. Those who are interested in doing justice to Rand’s views, even if
they disagree with her in the end, might well like to remember this.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Column on Rand and Selfishness

  1. Unknown says:

    fjg02g gtg09y wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold 泵 泵 泵 泵 水泵 水泵 水泵 水泵 水泵 齿轮输油泵 齿轮输油泵 环保设备 环保设备 China Travel China Tours China Tours beijing Tours beijing Tours beijing Travel beijing Travel shanghai Tours shanghai Tours shanghai Travel shanghai Travel wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold wow gold 泵 水泵 齿轮输油泵 环保设备

  2. Unknown says:

    Hi,Do you need advertising displays, digital signages, ad players, advertisement player and LCD advertisings? Please go Here:www.amberdigital.com.hk(Amberdigital).we have explored and developed the international market with professionalism. We have built a widespread marketing network, and set up a capable management team dedicated to provide beyond-expectation services to our customers.
    amberdigital Contact Us
    website:www.amberdigital.com.hk
    alibaba:amberdigital.en.alibaba.com[bbaaehidhchhacf]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s