Column on Tony Judt’s Last Prevarications

Tony Judt’s Last Prevarications

Tibor R. Machan

As a loyal though reluctant reader of The New York Review of Books–too
masochistic an experience at times but in my line of work
unavoidable–I have read a lot of essays by the recently deceased public
intellectual and NYU professor Tony Judt.  A skilled and erudite
writer, with some subtlety to his viewpoint, Judt has been trying to
juggle his social democratic stance with his recognition that socialism
itself is no answer to our socio-economic wows.  But his hostility to
free market capitalism has shown through in most of his political
writings.  (You really cannot be a writer for
TNYRB
if you show even a minimal appreciation for that economic system, what
with Paul Krugman at the helm of their team of economic pundits!)

In
what is likely to prove to be his final piece for the magazine,
published posthumously in the September 30, 2010, issue, Judt once again
lashes out against all those who find the free market system a
promising way to arrange a communty’s economic affairs.  In the piece,
titled “Captive Minds”–recalling Czeslaw Milosz 1950s book by the same
title–Judt engages in some character assassination directed at anyone
who disagrees with his assessment of capitalism.  As he writes, “But
‘the market’–like ‘dialectical materialism’–is just an abstraction: at
once ultra-rational (its argument trumps all) and the acme of unreason
(it is not open to question). It has its true believers–mediocre
thinkers by contrast with the founding fathers, but influential withal;
its fellow travelers–who may privately doubt the claims of the dogma
but see no alternative to preaching it; and its victims, many of whom in
the US especially have dutifully swallowed their pill and proudly
proclaim the virtues of a doctrine whose benefits they will never see.”

To
this Judt adds his demeaning, belittling, and snide comment about how
those who find the free market superior to other systems of political
economy suffer from a “collective inability to imagine alternatives,”
and similar unsubstantiated throwaway lines.  Just like so many who
complain about how you and I are stuck in a box we must escape, Judt
ultimately wants us all to climb into
his
box mostly as a show of his version of compassion and kindness.  (He
even brings up Margaret Thatcher, quoting her saying about the free
market that “there is no alternative,” missing entirely the instructive
fact that the late John Kenneth Galbraith, who shared Judt’s politics,
said exactly the same thing in an interview he gave to Alitalia’s
in-flight magazine back in the late 1980s.)

For
Judt the respectable thing to do is to be “debating genuine competitive
social models–whether social democratic, social market, or regulated
market variants of liberal capitalism.” Of course.  The sole alternative
that is verboten is one that spells complete freedom from government intrusion!
 Where would he and his ilk be if they didn’t have a chance to whisper
their instructions to politicians and bureaucrats?  

Judt
then lashes out, once again recklessly and indiscriminately, at all
Americans, by quote Milosz saying “the man of the East cannot take
Americans seriously because they have never undergone the experiences
that teach men how relative their judgments and thinking habits are.”
 What bunk!  The man of the East has nothing over the man of the West or
North or South–what kind of geopolitical prejudice are we supposed
swallow here?

Professor
Judt (RIP) had some fine qualities, mostly a knack for observing and
artfully recording elements of the ebb and flow of contemporary culture
East and West, but as to political economy he was no more than a
sophisticated sentimentalist (and someone whose elitist thinking fit
perfectly with the editorial stance of
The New York Review of Books).

Let
me end with a personal note about Judt’s slam against those who favor
the free society, namely, that they suffer from a “collective inability
to imagine alternatives.”  Not only have a lot of us who favor the fully
free market system managed to imagine alternatives but we also
experienced several of them, including Soviet style socialism, market
socialism, and, of course, the regulated market.  

Most
of us have spent a career studying these as well as the free market so
as to figure out what would suit human community life best, what would
be the most fitting order for men and women embarking upon a successful
(economic and related) life.  And only after we have done our work
reasonably thoroughly did most of us end up championing the system Judt
held in such contempt.  Nothing dogmatic here and to charge otherwise
betrays intellectual laziness, the disinclination to argue things
through.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s