Column on Europe’s Tragedy of the Commons

Europe’s (and our coming) Tragedy of the Commons

Tibor R. Machan


     Is this stuff with Greece and, soon, with Portugal, Spain and
Italy, and the rest of us all that surprising?  Has it not been clear
for ages that when people draw their support from a common pool, the
resources will soon vanish?

        Aristotle already noted this
phenomenon when he said, “For that which is common to the greatest
number has the least care bestowed upon it.  Every one thinks chiefly of
his own, hardly at all of the common interest; and only when he is
himself concerned as an individual.  For besides other considerations,
everybody is more inclined to neglect the duty which he expects another
to fulfill; as in families many attendants are often less useful than a
few." (Politics, 1262a30-37)  Biologist Garrett Hardin reaffirmed
the point in an influential essay, "The Tragedy of the Commons," for
the magazine Science, on December 13, 1968.

gist of the tragedy is that commonly held (important) resources will be
depleted and will not be replenished. And this doesn’t apply only to how
the wilds are being ruined by being held in common but also to national
treasuries which everyone in a country believes is there for him or her
to dip into indiscriminately. And then, with international communities,
the tragedy isn’t contained by national borders.

        One of
the largest commons these days is the European Union.  Everyone in
Europe is fighting to take from its common pool of stuff–mostly funds
through such outfits as the IMF, the World Bank, etc.–but few are eager
to replace what they have taken.  And this applies to the citizenry,
clearly, not only the politicians who want to please them.  (The IMF
draws a lot of its funds now from the USA! How long can that go on?)


     And the same is happening in the USA, of course, what with common
pools such as the so called Social Security fund slowly being drained. 
What are all those lobbyists doing in Washington? Looking to dip into
the common treasury as deeply as they can.  Getting stuff from the
government is always enthusiastically pursued while refilling its
coffers is not–who really volunteers to pay taxes, let alone more than
one must fork over?  That is just what the tragedy of the commons
amounts to, get as much out as you can, and put as little back as

        The best way to deal with the tragedy of the
commons is privatization!  But of course that would help put an end to
this constant promise of a free ride. Moreover, once people get used to
getting a free ride, at least for a while, they regard it as a God given
right for them to continue.  And there you have Greece today and the
rest of the welfare states of the globe tomorrow.  (Actually, most of
them are merely postponing their comeuppance.)

 Privatization–making the stuff of the world private property instead
of held in common–solves the problem because it imposes discipline. 
Everyone must cope with the limited stuff he or she has, can produce,
can obtain through peaceful trade, nothing more.  No one may dump his or
her waste on the neighbor!  No one may rip off the neighbor once out of
private resources.  Maybe in a few drastic emergencies such
transgressions will be tolerated but not as a rule, which is how it goes
now.  Such discipline as privatization brings about would also handle
most environmental problems.  Even a fiasco such as the oil mess in the
Gulf of Mexico would be more likely to be contained if the oceans itself
were privately owned–without very serious assurance of safety,
drilling would not be possible because private parties would be vigilant
about protecting their rightful interests!

        On numerous
fronts, then, we see that the problems that keep showing up in the daily
news are the result of reliance upon the commons.  Hardin himself
thought that a strict administration of the commons might solve the
problem but he didn’t take public choice theory into
consideration–people "in charge" have their own agendas and will not
really guard the ever elusive public interest.

        One way
to deal with all this is to come up with a sound constitution for a
country!  Constitutional economists, like James Buchanan, have been
advocating this for years but the public and the political class knows
that it would mean the end of their free ride.  Never mind that such a
free ride will end anyway.  But folks do think they can continue eating
their cake and having it, too.  Not a promising picture!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s