Column on Misanthropy Revisited

Misanthropy Revisited
Tibor R. Machan
It seems to me that among too many scientists and champions of science
there is a pointless misanthropy afoot, as if somehow to defend proper
science against its pseudo variety one needed to take down humanity a notch or
two. It seems to be doubtless that human beings have special (enough)
capacities, attributes, and so forth that classifying them as quite unlike
all other animals known to us makes eminently good sense. Just take a few
examples of what makes them so: it is human beings who do science, not
dogs or orangutans or crows. It is they who build museums, produce movies,
write novels, teach courses in anthropology and biology, etc., etc. Yes,
people also are known to be quite destructive and, as Aristotle said some
2500 years ago, "If there is anyone who holds that the study of the animal
is an unworthy pursuit, he ought to go farther and hold the same opinion
about the study of himself." But while we are all animals, there is a lot
that is quite different about people, different from other animals, and m
uch of it is quite beneficial, even admirable at times. (Think of the
works of Newton, Einstein, Mozart, Hugo, Degas, among others, in support
of this point.)
In a recent essay, in the magazine Science News (8/29/09, p. 5) by science
writer Bruce Bower about how crows use sticks, stones, etc., as tools,
much is made of what crows can do as something that "has debunked the
traditional view that tool use is a defining human characteristic."
Unfortunately, no example is given of any traditional view Mr. Bower may
have in mind but, in any case, the one that defines human beings by
reference to the capacity to use tools is at most just one and certainly
not the only traditional view. (Bower’s subsequent reference to one of
Aesop’s fables in his essay–in support of a separate point–"in which a
thirsty crow plunked rocks into a pitcher to raise the water level,"
indicates clearly that some traditional views see nothing odd about
nonhuman animals using tools.)
Now, just because some traditional views elevate human beings toward some
superhuman status, it doesn’t follow that human beings do not in fact
belong above many if not all the rest of the animals in the hierarchy of
living beings. Who can reasonably deny that people do far more interesting
and complicated things than at least the bulk of other animals? I mean, it
amount to sticking one’s head in the sand to deny this. And such
self-imposed ignorance is quite unbecoming of scientists, even science
writers. After all, the evidence shows, even in what scientists
themselves, as well as science writers, do that people are special. But
then so is an eagle in comparison with, say, a slug. Indeed, what is all
too evident, as we look around and study the world, is that there is a
great deal of diversity and among all the diverse living beings some have
capacities to do far more complicated and indeed valuable things than do
others.
I believe if writers like Bower concentrated more on reporting and avoided
gratuitous polemics, Science News would be a better magazine of science.
There is now altogether too much misanthropy in the world, including in
too many science magazines! As to what human beings should be defined as,
certainly at least one tradition states is that they are essentially
rational animals, which means they survive and flourish mainly by their
capacity for conceptual awareness, for thinking by means of complex ideas,
theories, etc. And this does seem quite right, does it not?
Yes, there is a continuum involved here. But between what crows and other
nonhuman animals can do a vast distance exists before one gets to what
humans can, such as editing magazines, building museums, and running
research centers in the great variety of disciplines Science News, among
other magazines, covers.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s