Column on Beholden to Our Ancestors

Beholden to our ancestors

Tibor R. Machan

When the idea of paying taxes, especially the exorbitant ones extorted
from the well to do, is debated, defenders sometimes maintain that these
are due because we owe it to our ancestors who forged institutions and
other results that now benefit us all. So even our own selves, our bodies,
health, pleasant looks, and, of course, any inheritance we were left by
our elders do not really belong to us free and clear.

No, these are all owned by us conditionally, provided we pay back some of
the goodies, through taxation and other burdens on us. We owe it, in other
words, to our ancestors because they left us with lots of benefits,
including such institutions as the legal system that protects us and our
property. The great art we have inherited from those who went before us,
for example, and the science, too, are what came our way and our use and
enjoyment of these all bestow upon us the obligation to pay with our labor
and resources which, of course, are to be collected from us by the
government. As one prominent defender of heavy taxation and government
wealth redistribution put it, "we haven’t just ‘come across’ our unearned
wealth. We–meaning the children of the rich–have inherited through a
systematic institution, which needs principled defense or critique." And
from this it is supposed to follow that we owe the government(!) and those
it picks for its largess big time.

Well, all this is quite open to dispute and skepticism. For one thing,
even if our ancestors, including parents and grandparents, left benefits
and riches for us to enjoy, it doesn’t follow that we owe something in
return. They, too, gained from their parents and grandparents and from the
surrounding world from which they obtained what they picked. And when they
produced what we inherited from them, they didn’t do so, at least as a
rule, so as to benefit us! It is a fair assumption that they created and
produced all the values they did because they believed it was something
they ought to do, something important quite apart from those of us who
followed in their footsteps. So we may safely assume they made their
wealth, art, science, and so forth because they wanted to do it quite
independently from what we inherited from them, except when, in fact, they
specifically planned to benefit their offspring or some causes they
believed in.

Another problem with this thesis is that when you give a gift to someone
who hasn’t asked for it, you don’t later get to go to that individual or
group and ask for payment! Unsolicited benefits are supposed to be given
gratis, free and clear of obligations in return. The artists and
scientists and entrepreneurs who have benefited us all unless they were
coerced to do so did it of their own free will and for reasons of their
own and did not attach the rider, "You may have all this provided you pay
your government for it." (Why, indeed, would it amount to payback to fork
out money to the government for all this? Those who provided us with the
benefits are, after all, long gone and current governments are not working
for them any longer but for current citizens.)

The best system for what some call inter-generational justice–for
squaring with our ancestors fairly–is the private property system that
does a reasonably decent job of securing for everyone what he or she has a
right to, what everyone is entitled to. The country’s system of property
law translates this idea of the right to private property from one
generation over to the next and except for cases of corruption or error,
this is how rights and obligations stretch out into the future. Those in
the past may be presumed to have taken good care of themselves with the
aid of this system as we are supposed to do for ourselves. (Cases of
corruption would be when those in the past stole from their fellows, like
the Europeans did from the native Americans for instance, and when slave
holders robbed the labor and time of their slaves, or when successful
common criminals did this from their victims! In these cases restitution
is due where it is possible to establish it through a just and functioning
legal system.)

Over the history of political thought there have often been those who
wanted to represent previous generations and take from current ones what
they regarded as payments but it is little more than either a gross error
or an outright ruse. It is a ploy by which some today get to take from
their fellows and has nothing at all to do with collecting various
mythical obligatory repayments!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s