Column on Trashing of Property Rights Again

Trashing of Property Rights Again

Tibor R. Machan

The Oakland Worldwide apartments in California do not ban smoking around
the pool frequented by renters. John Birke thinks that the smoke his child
is inhaling there is hurting her. But instead of taking the trouble of
moving to a place where no smoking is permitted by the pool, of which
there are plenty, he has decided to sue the owner(s). At first a lower
court tossed the lawsuit but then an appeals court gave it a go ahead. No
word yet how it will fare but just to get a chance at a win is a travesty
of justice in a free country. Nor did news reports disclose whether
Melinda Birke moved to the apartment complex after the policy of
permitting smoking around the pool was in place–a vital issue in
determining if she has a valid complaint.

When you own something it is for you to decided what is done with it
provided no one’s rights are being violated. When you rent someone an
apartment, if they know there is something done by fellow renters or you
that they do not like–something that even could injure them–they have to
put up with it or go elsewhere. They don’t get to move into the place and
then deny others the right to be free to smoke or whatever that’s not an
imposition. And it is no imposition when the lack of a smoking ban is
fully disclosed.

Now the radical position, the right one, is not widely embraced and
practiced, mainly because the government makes rules for private parties
which these parties may not break even if these rules are onerous. So if
my apartment house were to make it OK for renters to run around nude at
the pool and everyone knew about this before renting there, anti-nudists
would have no justification for throwing a hissy-fit about it all although
the government would probably ban it. And the same with smoking or
anything else one doesn’t approve of. As they used to say, without
flinching or irony, "It’s a free country, go live elsewhere if you don’t
like it here."

The reactionary trend toward making government determine what rights we
all have rather than human nature, which is how the Founders did it, is
now rampant. Rent control, for example, is a perfect example of government
violating the rights of the apartment owners who should have no one
telling them what rents to charge. It’s supposed to be a free country.
And, yes, this extends even to racial discrimination–if it is my place, I
get to be a racist about it however vicious racism is. (I am free, so far,
to be a racist when I pick my friends and lovers, which again is arguably
irrational.)

In a genuine free country a great many ways of life are possible, many of
them objectionable, even morally odious for some but not others–one size
does not fit all. But in the nanny state that America is becoming, the
ruling opinion is imposed on everyone, be this opinion sound or unsound.
The only exception so far is with what someone has a right to say or whom
someone may worship. The First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution still
gives legal protection to everyone’s right to freedom of expression and
religion but it’s hard to say for how long. There are some trends
suggesting that even these rights may come under assault. People who
dispute man made global warming, for example, have been threatened with
being barred from all government contracts even though the spirit and
letter of the 14th Amendment clearly makes this unconstitutional.

When one finds oneself in the minority with one’s life style, one’s
choices, tastes and preferences–even with what may well be one’s better
judgment–one makes one’s way in life without coercing others to fall in
line. A free country is also supposed to be a pluralist, multicultural
country and the fact is that what some people would enjoy in life may
annoy others to no end.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Column on Trashing of Property Rights Again

  1. Dennis says:

    What about this scenario: a factory downwind is belching smoke that is making so-and-so sick?

  2. mikeinwny says:

    Dennis, that is a completely different scenario. Your scenario is causing harm on someone else\’s property.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s