Column on Not Everyone Should Vote

Not every should vote!
Tibor R. Machan
Back in 1992 I wrote a column for The Chicago Tribune that is even more
pertinent now, with the recent publication of George Mason University
economist Professor Bryan Caplan’s book, The Myth of the Rational Voter
(Princeton University Press, 2007). Here is the gist of it, only slightly
edited.
From various celebrities to the radio announcer at the station to which I
listen, everyone urged me to vote this coming November. But, in fact, it
isn’t always such a good idea to vote.
I did, actually, fill out my absentee ballot but decided not to vote in a
bunch of the races I had a chance to make a choice. I did record my
choices on most of the ballot measures. When it came, however, to the
folks who wanted to be judges and members of city council and such, I
decided I had no idea what they stood for and voting for them would just
be irresponsible.
And I bet that is so with nearly all of us–many of the people we have a
chance to vote for or against are unknown to us. This is especially so
when it comes to their ideas on the various issues they will have to
address once in office. That is very troubling, since these days
politicians address nearly every issue under the sun. Government isn’t
limited to keeping the peace so one could keep abreast of its activities
fairly simply. No, in Congress the men and women serving must decide about
everything from how many tanks should go to NATO forces to what percentage
of alcohol must be in imported beer. Municipal, county, state and federal
authorities have their noses into millions of issues and very few citizens
they serve have even a clue as to how they will decide on them. It would
take innumerable full time jobs to keep tabs on today’s issues facing
Congress, the state assembly, the county supervisors, and the city
council.
So those who urge us all to vote need to temper their enthusiasm with a
little dosage of reality. Most of us are ignorant about the issues and,
moreover, this is unavoidable. We cannot possible keep up and still have a
life of our own. As a result, if we were to listen to the counsel of all
those celebrities, it would guarantee that our representatives would get
elected by a bunch of ignoramuses. Come to think of it, isn’t that just
what we witness in the various centers of power? Isn’t that one of the
reasons political discourse is so inept, sinks so low, is so full of
character assassination and void of substance in most regions?
It is plainly impossible these days to educate the public about all of
what politicians and their appointed bureaucrats need to know to do the
right thing. When folks must make decisions for so many people, on so many
issues, there is no way to do the right thing–one will necessarily wrong
many of the people affected. Even having a general political vision is
insufficient, mainly because those who hold office vote not so much in
line with some political philosophy but as they believe the various vested
interests in their districts would like them to.
One reason the American Founders wanted a limited government is that they
were aware of how much of a war of all against all the politics of a
democracy could become unless democracy is severely checked. Government
was supposed to secure our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness and elections were to decide only who we hire to do this job. By
now, however, the job has gotten way out of hand — politicians and
bureaucrats have taken over supervision of nearly all parts of our lives.
And the people are completely divided as to what they want from them. It
all depends where their vested interest lies and what kind of coalitions
they can arrange.
Yet, there is no way they can actually learn which proposal their
politicians can vote for or against will do them the most good. So what is
left? To vote ignorantly, based on vague impressions, style, feel, sex
appeal, etc. Or to refrain from voting.
In such a climate it is no wonder that people begin to yearn for a
simplified process, one whereby perhaps a great leader provides us with
political guidance. In some areas the only virtue left to democracy is how
it slows down political power. Even that is unappreciated by many people
(consider how when a bunch of "world leaders" come together to sign some
treaty they need to face the agony of selling the deal to their people;
and then they are badgered about it by the less democratic of the
parties).
I say, vote only if you have a clue. Otherwise do not vote and then,
perhaps, the selection process will gain from the fact that the few who
vote do have a clue. But, of course, the real answer is to reduce the
scope of what politicians can vote on and keep them worried about just a
few matters, mostly how best to defend our individual rights.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s