A Visit to RFE-RL

A Visit to RFE-RL

Tibor R. Machan

Prague, Czech Republic. In 1953 I was smuggled out of Hungary by a
professional "flesh peddler" (as TIME magazine called these extremely
helpful people) and landed, for three years, in Munich, Germany. That’s
because my father was working at Radio Free Europe there, as a director of
sports coverage. My stepmother was doing some acting gigs for the
Hungarian sector and even I got to do a few lines in various plays that
had a character in his teens. I used to hang out a lot at the facilities
in the English Garden and befriended a lot of expatriates from the various
Iron Curtain countries who helped the effort to inform listeners in those
countries about what went on in the world and whatever else they were
supposed to be doing. (Prior to leaving Hungary I used to listen to RFE,
when I could–because the reception was awful and transmissions were also
being blocked by the commies–mostly to hear my dad on the air.)

Later, when I began to think more carefully about political matters, I had
some trepidations about whether RFE and similar ventures carried out by
the United States government could pass my libertarian test for what
amounts to proper public policy. Should American citizens be forced to
fund this kind of undertaking–including Voice of America and, later,
several others, beaming news and, let’s face it, propaganda to victims of
Soviet and Soviet bloc oppression? Can this be construed as legitimate
foreign policy for a bona fide free society? Why or why not?

But back in the mid-fifties I had no problem accepting RFE as a sound
effort, seeing how little information the Soviet satellite countries would
allow their citizens to gather from their state run media. There was
little doubt in my mind that the Americans and their Western allies were
far better, freer countries than those under Soviet rule and whatever
reasonable effort was made to thwart the power of the USSR was Ok by me.
Of course the big question for me turned out, later, to be what amounted
to reasonable in such efforts.

In our time it would appear to be clear enough that there is no longer any
plausible rationale for Radio Free Europe and its sister, Radio Liberty.
Yet, on my visit to Prague, where I was asked to give a short presentation
to the staff about the situation in mid-fifties and what I could recall
about RFE then, several folks argued that there are sound reasons to
continue what RFE/RL liberty had been and continues to be doing, which is
to "provide uncensored news and information to countries where a free
press is either banned by the government or not fully established." As a
died in the wool "defensivist" on matters of public policy, I have my
doubts that such efforts on the part of a government of a free country
qualify as proper public policy. A defensivist, you see, holds–following
the political science sketched in the Declaration of Independence–that
governments are instituted to secure our basic human rights. They are,
therefore, only justified in conducting defensive public policies and it
is unclear whether broadcasting propaganda, however honest and truthful,
into "countries where a free press is either banned by the government or
not fully established" qualifies as defensive public policy. Arguably
such an effort is more about defending the liberty of those in such
countries, not of the citizens of the United States of America whom the
government is sworn to serve.

Yet perhaps a more nuanced take on the foreign affairs of a free society
would not so readily dismiss what RFE and RL are doing as overstepping the
proper authority of a free government. Educating people in countries
where people have no chance to encounter discussions of the principles and
policies of relatively free societies may arguably amount to an element of
defense, given how ignorance about liberty can generate often deadly
hostility toward free societies. Moreover, engaging in this kind of
educational foreign policy may also be a rather preferable substitute for
more militaristic efforts to secure the liberty of citizens of relatively
free societies in today’s world.

I am not proposing to resolve these matters here but it is worth
reflecting on them, I think, since the defensivist foreign policy that’s
appropriate for free countries can take a variety of forms and, moreover,
isn’t something to be decided upon a priori. My own experience with RFE
was an instructive part of my early life, helping me to come to terms in
time with the principles and problems of proper, free governments. I
suspect that investing in the peaceful propaganda efforts of which RFE and
RL are a part is highly preferable to embarking on various military
missions so as to defend liberty for American citizens and also to spread
it around the world in ways that do not produce hostility and acrimony.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to A Visit to RFE-RL

  1. Unknown says:

    Hi,Do you need advertising displays, digital signages, advertising player and LCD displays? Please go Here:www.amberdigital.com.hk(Amberdigital).we have explored and developed the international market with professionalism. We have built a widespread marketing network, and set up a capable management team dedicated to provide beyond-expectation services to our customers.
    amberdigital Contact Us

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s