Column on CNN’s Statism

The Statism of CNN

Tibor R. Machan

Should one ever claim that mainstream media is statist, let alone Left
leaning, a bunch of voices will rise in protest. How could that be?
After all, don’t giant corporations own the media? Which, of course,
assumes something totally unwarranted, namely, that corporations are
managed by champions of free enterprise. Baloney. Corporate managers can
be just as devoted to trying to get government to redistribute wealth in
their direction as are educators, artists, scientists, farmers, or any
other “special interest” group.

The charge that is worth considering is that the media, especially news
organizations with their commentators and reporters, lean toward statism,
which is to say, they favor turning to government with nearly any problem
people face in their communities. The only exception is where the press
itself faces problems, and when it comes to religious matters, mainly
because the fairly strong tradition of separation of journalism and
government, as well as religion and government, at least in the United
States of America.

On a recent lecture tour through a good bit of Europe I had a chance to
watch BBC-TV and CNN-TV quite regularly. Although I speak and understand a
smattering of German, English is the language I use routinely for
obtaining information on current affairs.

On one occasion I was watching a report on Kenya which just went through
an especially violent election season. I turns out that one result of
this has been a serious reduction of tourism in that country the economy
of which is usually the vital beneficiary of this industry.

At the beginning of the broadcast CNN’s anchor introduced the topic and
then brought in a stringer from Kenya who elaborated on it, giving some
specifics, numbers, and anecdotal evidence. Once this was over, the
camera went back to the anchor who promptly posed the following question:
“What is the Kenyan government doing about this problem?” Exactly why it
is the government’s task to do anything at all about tourism in Kenya
viewers were not told. Just what skills does the government possess that
would especially qualify it to do something about this problem? Nothing
was said about that.

Imagine for a moment that the TV audience was being given a report on a
sporting event, say the recent Wimbledon tennis tournament. As was the
case this year, many of the games, especially during finals, experienced
inclement weather. Frequent showers led to stoppage of matches and a few
had to be extended into the wee hours of the night. But, lo and behold, no
commentators raised the question, “What are the referees doing about the
inclement weather?”

But, you may say, well the weather is something very different from
violent interruptions of political elections. Yes, in some ways it is.
But in some ways it isn’t. Both manage to interrupt normal proceedings
and neither can be dealt with post facto, including by those charged with
upholding the rules. While the government might have done something about
the violence that interrupted Kenyan electoral politics, once the
interruption occurred, what could it do? Nothing.

The best way to improve the climate for tourism in Kenya has nothing much
to do with government. It has to do with merchants getting back to work,
resorts opening their doors, oil companies revving up their productivity,
and business in general hiring reliable security agents; this might well
make Kenya into an especially appealing place for tourists to visit with
no help from the government.

It is, of course, ironic that a CNN’s anchor would assume that government
will solve Kenya’s tourism problem, given that governments tend to pose
rather annoying obstacles to tourism in most places around the globe.
Moreover, the violence during the election campaigns had been prompted, in
large measure, by the political circumstances of Kenya, so it isn’t likely
that politicians are going to manage to remedy matters.

In any case, the point I wish to focus on is just how readily CNN buys
into the government habit, how it is nearly second nature to its anchors
to expect all problems to be solved by government, never mind whether it
is government’s expertise that best addresses the problem. And CNN isn’t
alone, only a clear cut example. For CNN the government is treated as the
almighty. Not only is it not the task of news anchors to perpetuate the
myth of almighty government but such a myth will reinforce false
expectations.

It is bad enough that too many ordinary folks place their trust in
government—the use of physical force—but to have the supposedly impartial,
unbiased media reinforce this is unprofessional and truly lamentable.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s