Column on Building Paradoxes

Building Paradoxes
Tibor R. Machan
Never have I resided in or visited a locale in America where there hasn’t
been an active historical preservation society. These are the
organizations that impose all sorts of restrictions on property owners
about what may or may not be build, renovated, restituted within the
borders of what the activist consider to be “their community.” Now and
then I even attend planning commission meetings where I live, just to
witness the utter, unabashed arrogance of these preservers of
architectural history. Members of such committees are invariably convinced
that they own everyone’s property and may dictate to all concerned what
may be done with what is, after all, supposed to be private property. (Not
that these are the only such organizations surrounding communities across
the land and, indeed, the globe. The sense of entitlement to butt in where
folks ought to have no authority to decide is sadly almost universal.)
Now this is something one can lament forever and it is quite clear, at
least to many decent folks, that the tyranny of such groups is
intolerable, however much various quirks in the legal system manage to
make them legitimate. That’s not what I want to consider here. An aspect
of this situation, however, is worth taking not of because it points up
just how convoluted is the thinking of advocates of such intrusiveness.
All the while that the preservationists are hell bent on leaving things as
they used to be, thus retarding development, some of those very same
people insist that all buildings conform to up to date technical standards
when it comes to safety, health, and security. Thus the standards laid
down by such governmental bodies as the federal agency OSHA–Occupational
Safety and Health Administration–and various local bodies that determine
the building codes–are also vigorously promoted and imposed on property
owners everywhere.
Just exactly how these two equally widely embraced objectives of people
who love to meddle in others’ lives can be reconciled has always puzzled
me. If you want to preserve what’s old because of its historical
significance, how can you insist that it be updated to conform to the
latest technological standards? And if that’s not possible, which is going
to take precedence? Is it more important for us all–because, after all,
these goals are all supposed to serve the public interest, the common
good, as opposed to serving private profit, which is what builder of new
structures are supposedly committed to–to be as safe as possible or is it
more important to enjoy authentic historical structures in our
neighborhoods?
Of course, there is no answer to this question because for different
people and groups, different objectives could easily be more vital. Some
folks ought to live and work in places fully equipped with the most
affordable up to date gadgetry, while others may be much better of–pursue
their happiness for more effectively–if they embrace the architectural
and construction treasures of history. Some like their abode to be a
historical exhibition, some a model of the latest and highest options of
building technology. And there are, I am sure, all kinds of valid
combination of objectives that no group of meddling bureaucrats can even
imagine yet have no hesitation about imposing on everyone.
Of course, this is not the only paradox that is inherent in the policy of
meddlers. Another one of my favorites is that these folks actually manage
to convince themselves of the utterly conceited notion that they alone
know what is right and good for all when it comes to planning buildings,
neighborhoods, and communities. Does it not occur to them, to quote
Abraham Lincoln, that “No man is good enough to govern another man,
without that other’s consent”?
I guess not. Instead they probably live in the reactionary past when kings
and dukes and barons thought they had it all over the rest of humanity
when it came to giving direction to human lives. I say bunk to that and
hope you will in time agree with me!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s