Column on Whether Libertarianism is Utopian

Libertarianism Isn’t Utopian
Tibor R. Machan
Although it is prudent to be skeptical about the entries found at
Wikipedia, the on line encyclopedia offers a sound account of utopias:
“Utopia is a term for an ideal society. It has been used to describe both
intentional communities that attempted to create an ideal society, and
fictional societies portrayed in literature. The term is sometimes used
pejoratively, in reference to an unrealistic ideal that is impossible to
achieve….”
At a recent conference I directed for Freedom Communications, Inc., the
criticism that libertarianism is utopian took center stage. It was
advanced by a respectful critic, one who was not disdainful but merely
doubtful about the soundness of libertarianism as a viable approach to
thinking about public affairs. The gist of the doubtful thesis amounted to
the claim that libertarianism is altogether too negative about government,
indeed, that libertarians tend to hate politics and all that’s associated
with it.
I found myself inspired to reflect upon the critic’s charge, especially
since just a few weeks ago I penned a column contending that contemporary
politics has become thoroughly corrupt. It is now virtually routine for
politicians to be panderers, people who seek to be elected to public
office on the basis of offering voters benefits that they will deliver at
the expense of others. For virtually every politician the first principle
seems to be to promote wealth redistribution, taking from Peter and
handing some of what was taken to Paul, while keeping a good bit for
politicians and their employees, bureaucrats.
Is this evidence supporting the claim that libertarians hate politicians,
consider government all bad? Not quite.
When one considers an institution or profession as having been corrupted,
it is generally understood that there could be instances of it that are
not corrupted. Corruption means having gone bad, having seriously
deteriorated from the proper, legitimate sort. Like a bad apple or rotten
tomato, corrupt politics assume that there could be a right sort of the
thing.
Libertarianism is a political stance that is well sketched out in the
Declaration of Independence, a document that the American Founders–mainly
Thomas Jefferson–crafted and signed on July 4, 1776. Seeing that the
anniversary of this date is the most significant American holiday being
celebrated every year in America, and that’s about to happen this year, it
may be useful to quote the few lines that lay out the conception it
proposes as to the nature of a proper government: “We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed….”
The libertarian view of government is that this institution has as its
purpose to secure the unalienable rights of the citizenry that’s to be
served by the government via certain just powers. Government, in turn,
becomes corrupt when this purpose is abandoned and others take its place.
Politicians, who are supposed to run for offices that contribute to the
proper purpose of government, become corrupt when they run for offices
that do not contribute to this proper purpose but to others, including
coercive wealth redistribution, coercive micromanagement of the lives of
the citizenry, coercive regulation of commerce, science, health care and
many other aspects of the lives of the citizenry.
Admittedly, this conception of government is not what has been most
prominent throughout human history and, indeed, across the globe in our
own time. Even in America, where the Declaration was penned and was
supposed to guide the drafting of the constitution of the federal
government (and even, in time, state governments), the idea is
revolutionary. But that isn’t what is vital in this discussion.
What is vital is that for those who see the view sketched in the
Declaration as sound, as do most libertarians, government can be
understood in positive, benign terms and need by no means be “hated.” Only
when governments become corrupted do they become objects of derision, even
hatred, mainly because their powers are then utilized for unjust purposes,
which is a grave dereliction of their duty.
Think of it like this: Medicine is a wonderful, positive profession but
when medical professionals abandon their purpose and utilize their
skills–powers–to perpetrate quackery, they have become corrupt and are
deserving of criticism, even sanction. That is just what the libertarian
thinks about most governments, now or in the past. But the libertarian
isn’t deluded into thinking that even the best possible government will be
a road to the solution of all social, let alone, personal problems people
face in a country. Now that’s utopianism.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s