Column on Revisiting Anti-Americanism

Revisiting Anti-Americanism
Tibor R. Machan
From the time I was a kid and read a lot of American fiction in Hungarian
translations, I had a great fondness for what I took to be the American
spirit of individualism and love for life. Zane Grey was my favorite, but
I was also very fond of Erle Stanley Gardner’s numerous Perry Mason
novels. Then there was Mark Twain, Max Brand, and a host of others,
although I was also an avid reader of the German tax evader, Karl May, who
wrote numerous novels about the American West as well as the Arab world.
When in time I finally reached these shores, I had no illusions that
American was just what these fictitious works depicted. But inspired by
the fictional renditions I certainly started out with a favorable attitude
toward this country. Not that I was unaware of problems, including some
very dark patches of history. But all in all, compared to the places I was
familiar with, such as communist Hungary, Nazi Germany, the Soviet bloc in
general, what America had to offer both actually and in its promise–by
means of the crux of its political and legal systems–certainly very much
appealed to me.
I came here when Ike, Dwight D. Eisenhower, was president and followed his
1956 contest with Adlai Stevenson and while my sophistication left much to
be desired, I liked Ike more than his rival, mainly because even then I
noticed that those supporting Stevenson had a good deal of underlying
hostility toward what I took to be central to America, namely its
essential individualism and largely free socio-economic system. Compared
to other places with which I was familiar America seemed to me to be quite
a humane, just, and free society.
Ever since then I had my eyes and ears on those Americans who seemed to me
to dislike the country precisely for the reasons I saw so much promise in
it. When I entered college and, later, the world of university education,
I noticed to my dismay that a great many educators were rather avidly
opposed to the country that I found so basically sound, though by no means
perfect. Over the years that I have mingled with the higher education
crowd I found more and more evidence of a steady hostility among people
teaching college and university students, doing research in the
humanities, and in the social sciences. To them one could add many
journalists and entertainers, I began to realize, and I have dedicated
part of my life to studying whether they had a case against America that I
was missing and to refuting their allegations which I saw to be
essentially groundless.
Just the other day I was perusing the Sunday, April 27, 2008, New York
Times and ran across a very typical example of the attitude that I have
found so distressing. In an essay titled “The Short End of the Longer
Life,” penned by one Kevin Sack in the Week in Review section, reporting
on various life expectancy and longevity statistics, I ran across the
following opening sentence: “Throughout the 20th century, it was an
American birthright that each generations would live longer than the
last.” This very same point was then used as a blurb later in the piece,
indicating that not only the writer but the editor found the idea valid.
But is it?
Are Americans really thinking of a growing life expectancy as a
birthright? Do they believe that just because they are born, they have a
right to expect to live long? The piece gave no evidence of this at all.
The numbers had nothing to do with such a finding. No, this was merely a
snide little put down of Americans, contending that they are stupid enough
to have come to see a statistical trend as a natural necessity, even a
right! If that were true, it would, in fact, indicate that Americans are
silly. But nothing in the piece serves to demonstrate it and the only
explanation I can think of is that both writer and editor simply wanted to
demean Americans.
Why? Why is there this need by so many elite organizations, individuals,
institutions to put down a country that is not only comparatively the best
for its citizenry but is in fact best for the very people making such
snide unfounded observations? Go figure!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Column on Revisiting Anti-Americanism

  1. Unknown says:

    ガーデンファニチャー

    福島競馬場

    アダルトショップ 

    まつげカール

    夫 浮気

    妻 浮気

    ストーカー 調査

    体験入店 銀座

    二人だけの結婚式

    アダルトグッズ

    表参道 エステ

    英会話 学習

    税理士 東京

    電報

    結婚式

    まつげ エクステ

    カップリングパーティー

    素行調査

    興信所

    興信所

    高収入 アルバイト

    高収入 アルバイト

    競馬予想

    電話占い

    カップリングパーティー

    結婚式 ウェルカムボード

    株式情報

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s